The Deeply Spiritual Film, “Silent Light”

Rembrandt - The Mennonite Minister Cornelis Cl...

Rembrandt – The Mennonite Minister Cornelis Claesz. Anslo in Conversation with his Wife, Aaltje (detail) – WGA19143 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Taking the existence of God for granted, Silent Light (2009) is a truly religious picture—and a superlative one.  In it, the head of a Mennonite family living in northern Mexico has confessedly fallen in love with another woman (“confessedly” because he told his wife about it).  That the wife is as understanding and tolerant as she is just might strain credulity, but so be it.  What’s important is Carlos Reygadas’s poetic filmmaking for the crafting of something spiritually, metaphysically meaningful.

The first half of this long film is partly about the illusion that sin is some kind of summum bonum—evident in the scene of outdoor smooching between the two adulterers.  Assuredly the second half is about sin as well, but the theme of grace also emerges.  The “silent light” of the title—since light never makes a sound, it must be a metaphor—is a divine miracle near the movie’s end.  It may be a miracle hard to accept, but Reygadas is intimating that the concept of the Deity in control should not be hard to accept.

Silent Light is a Mexican film whose dialogue is in the Mennonite low German language.

Better Overhaul The Welfare State

For a long time now, the United States has had imposed on it the concept of Salvation By Bureaucracy.  Not spiritual but material salvation.  Welcome to our welfare state.  It isn’t the kind of welfare state we should have, since these bureaucracies are inadequate and wasteful and very expensive, and government deficits are still rising.  Every year 70 billion Medicare and Medicaid dollars are lost to fraud and improper payments, which means every year 70 billion is poured down a rathole, thus we often have Salvation By Bureaucracy for people who don’t need to be saved.

I say we ought to do what Charles Murray has proposed:  abolish Medicare and Medicaid and all other transfer-payment programs, and replace them with an annual grant of $13,000 to every adult in the nation, 21 and older.  The grant would be reimbursed through a surtax placed on what are by anyone’s estimation decent salaries.  This way, Salvation By Bureaucracy is attenuated.  This way, low wages are less of a burden.  This way, Social Security and Medicare never become unspeakably insolvent.  This way, bargaining for a particular salary can be a sure thing.

My own view is that at the same time there should be nationwide federal propaganda teaching the American people to use this money for health care, assisted living, car insurance—the important things.  It should stress that this is all the government money they will be getting, unless the states are stupid enough to provide some welfare dough of their own.  Many will not listen, of course, but others will; and why, in any case, should we have a government which babies American adults?  Bureaucrats regularly decide things for low-income people, as though they alone possess the smarts for this.  They won’t be propagandists; they’ll be—and they are—nannies.  But nannies can’t prevent the staggering debt that will spring up when, in the span of two decades, millions and millions of Americans start receiving Social Security and Medicare.  What politicians have recently done is cut taxes by $1.5 trillion, but, well, what’s going on is not exactly economic conservatism.

Savior: Two Items

To redeem us, Jesus Christ did not need to do what condemned sinners are said to do:  suffer forever.  In Hell.  No way.  Jesus suffered temporarily.  If it wasn’t necessary for the Paschal Lamb to suffer forever, why is it necessary for the unsaved?

From Psalm 22:  “All the ends of the earth will remember and turn to the Lord, and all the families of the nations will bow down before him” (NIV).

The New Jerusalem Bible translates the words for “all the ends of the earth” as “the whole wide world.”  The whole wide world will remember and turn to the Lord.  All humanity?  Seems that way.  From Psalm 65:  “O thou that hearest prayer, unto thee shall all flesh come.”

Be Saved, All You Ends of the Earth

Isaiah

Isaiah (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

“Turn to me and be saved, all you ends of the earth; for I am God, and there is no other.  By myself I have sworn, my mouth has uttered in all integrity a word that will not be revoked:  Before me every knee will bow; by me every tongue will swear” (Isaiah 45, NIV).

This is strong language.  What fanfare!  But why?  Why is it so important that God has uttered in all integrity the not-to-be-revoked “Before me every knee will bow”?  A number of Bible translations render the last part of this passage “every tongue will swear allegiance.”  Allegiance?  Yes, to God.  Remember Philippians 2:11 (“every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord”).  Again, why the fanfare?  Is it because all people will ultimately be saved, that this is what it means for every knee to bow, etc.?

Do They Notice An Outrageousness?

Christian women, like other women, chat about past gatherings with relatives, as on holidays.  Obviously they mention mothers and fathers and grandparents and others who have passed on, liking the stories they tell about them, getting a laugh because of them.  But some, or many, of these relatives were not Christians; they never converted.  They died in their sins.  Thus the church would have to regard them as being damned in Hell.  Yet I inexorably sense that these women (men too) secretly believe that their relatives died in grace, that somehow God went ahead and saved them.  Perhaps they wouldn’t converse about them if they didn’t.  It’s like this:  They had a grandpa who never lived a Christian life—never—but it’s okay.  God didn’t allow him to go to Hell.  He will be judged, yes, but not damned.  Why should they believe such a thing?

They do, however, or they behave as though they do.  Are they secretly noticing an outrageousness in the damnation doctrine?  Do they suspect (I more than suspect) that the traditional church is wrong?