Throw That “Swordfish” (The 2001 Movie) Back!

I thought movie acting had gotten considerably better than it frequently was in the past, but after seeing the caper flick Swordfish (2001), directed by Dominic Sena, I’m not so sure.  John Travolta starts out badly but gets better.  Hugh Jackman, Halle Berry and Don Cheadle, however, merely go through the motions, undermining an already rubbishy concoction.  How ludicrous Swordfish is we see in just the opening few moments:  all those explosives wrapped around the bodies of Travolta’s hostages.  From there things just get clunkier, and more foul-mouthed.  Gratuitously Miss Barry exposes her Josephine Baker breasts.  Needless to say, the film is not only commercial but shabbily so.

Cover of "Swordfish [Blu-ray]"

Cover of Swordfish [Blu-ray]

Is Joyce Maynard’s “Labor Day” any Good? – A Book Review

The Joyce Maynard novel, Labor Day (2009) is, I think, interesting and competently written; but is it also forgettable?

A prison inmate called Frank runs away from the hospital he is in for an appendectomy, then forces Adele, the divorced mother of Henry (the book’s 13-year-old narrator), to drive him to her house where he will hole up for the Labor Day weekend and a couple of days prior to it.  Frank is a likable man not wholly guilty of what he was sentenced for; Adele is a sensitive recluse whose children, except for Henry, died on her as surely as her marriage died.  Implacably the two begin a hidden romance.  Planning to flee to Canada and take Henry with them, Frank and Adele are unaware of certain forces that will firmly block and cripple them.

Appealing details crop up in the novel, and although Frank is a bit too rudely good to be true, the characters are believable.  I dislike the many sexual references that exist in modern American novels but . . . the ones here do not seem excessive.  Or un-called for.  Still, is the book (finally) forgettable?

Actually, I think it comes close to being so, but escapes it by showing the reader what it means when a human life is reduced to the bare necessities, to actions and habits incapable of bringing a person anything like happiness or self-fulfillment.  And it is endlessly compelling on the subject of isolation.  If it were not for this, Labor Day WOULD be forgettable, the kind of thing we’ve seen before.

Two more items:  Maynard’s novel is not a tragedy; it has a happy ending.  And it has been made into a movie.

English: Joyce Maynard at the 2010 Texas Book ...

English: Joyce Maynard at the 2010 Texas Book Festival, Austin, Texas, United States. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

A Stone’s Throw, A Peckinpah Western: “Ride the High Country”

Director Sam Peckinpah had better material to work with in the days when censorship was still noticeably strong in American film, as witness his Ride the High Country (1962), an engaging Western starring Randolph Scott and Joel McCrea.  Originally written for the screen, the good (though not great) script by N.B. Stone, Jr. has two aging gents transporting a bank’s gold to a mining camp in addition to helping a hapless young woman (Mariette Hartley) escape her deeply foolish, tyrannical Christian—or “Christian”—father.  As a follower of Christ I might have been greatly put off by this depiction but, well, such people as this guy have been a part of human history.

The Hartley character wishes to marry a good-looking but squalid miner (James Drury) from a repulsive family.  After the knot is tied, she immediately sees what a ghastly mistake she has made, and the bank guards execute a rescue which precipitates violence.  At one point Joel McCrea’s old-timer declares that all he wants in life is “to enter my house [i.e., death] justified,” which is more than the other characters want, including, it seems, the other old-timer (Scott).  Human behavior is quite shabby here.  The film is about that which bombards, or prevents, self-respect, the knowledge that one is justified in one’s actions.  It is in fact conveyed that one always feels justified in working for his bread and butter.

NTF104 hint1

NTF104 hint1 (Photo credit: a75)

Would That The “Hood” Were Better: 1991’s “Boyz N The Hood”

Written and directed by John Singleton in his twenties, Boyz n the Hood (1991) is no two-bit feat.  It’s explosive.  Even so, Singleton’s youth hamstrung him into a great naivete, and a certain decadence develops in this film about South Central L.A. 

Hood‘s political significance goes no further than to show an African-American boy giving a picture of Ronald Reagan the finger, which is meant to express Singleton’s own anti-Reaganism, anti-rightism.  Or to put into the mouth of a decent man acted by Laurence Fishburne words about how drugs, guns, and even liquor are being transported to the inner cities so that whites can see to it that blacks are gradually polished off.  Absolutely nothing belies our suspicion that this is Singleton’s view too.

The film’s early scenes include some lame, idiotic material about an arrogant black boy (sympathetically viewed by our director) who disturbs a white teacher’s (unsympathetically viewed by our director) grade-school class.  In the religion department, there is some trite philosophical talk about God, uttered by the South Central “boyz n the hood” themselves, and a Roman Catholic girl named Brandi who, despite her moral beliefs, opts to comfort Cuba Gooding Jr. by losing her virginity to him—a decision Singleton finds touching.  After all this, how could I not pronounce Hood decadent? 

Cover of "Boyz N the Hood [UMD for PSP]"

Cover of Boyz N the Hood [UMD for PSP]

Gay Marriage and the Resulting Madness (Politics)

Here we go.  Two gay men take a Colorado baker, Jack Phillips, to court because he declined to bake them a wedding cake.  The judge rules that Phillips either prepares the cake or pays a fine, his religious beliefs be damned.

This is hardly the first time something like this has happened.  Advocates for same-sex marriage demand that people violate their consciences in the interest of something the State has legalized.  They are coerced into “recognizing” its “legitimacy” (the quotation marks are necessary), but nothing but the impulse to deny religious freedom is at work here.

Such advocates say to all of us, “I want you to be a Follower.”  Not a Follower of God, to be sure, but a Follower of today’s ultra-egalitarianism.  I say:  LET’S GO TO WAR AGAINST THIS MADNESS!

Suicide and “The Fire Within” (A 1963 French Film)

The French director who left me disgusted with Murmur of the Heart left me satisfied with The Fire Within (the French title is Le Feu follet—“Will-o’-the-wisp”), a 1963 gem.  Louis Malle, the director, outdid himself with what is an adaptation of a novel I haven’t read about a man’s unstoppable suicide.

Life seems mainly worth living in the film, but perhaps not for Alain (Maurice Ronet), a former (?) alcoholic with no money of his own and a dissatisfying marriage to an American wife living in New York.  Confidently Malle delivers a world—in 1960s Versailles and Paris—of socially undamaging psychological pathology.  Quiet neurosis is almost everywhere, but Alain is the only suicidal character.  Yet the film induces us to ask questions.  Is Alain’s situation actually hopeless?  At the beginning of the movie we see him with a mistress.  Maybe for a damaged man who cheats on his wife it is hopeless.  Then again, does Alain’s suicide merely emanate from what seems to be an unyielding self-absorption?

The Fire Within is challenging.  For me it is a trifle hard to get through since incidents in the film are scarce, but it’s an utterly mature, smartly made artwork with enjoyable Satie music on the soundtrack.

(In French with English subtitles)

Cover of "The Fire Within - Criterion Col...

Cover of The Fire Within – Criterion Collection